Why isn’t it mandatory for MPs to use the public services (schools, healthcare etc) they are charged with providing for the rest of us? Wouldn’t that improve them lickity split?
    21+

    I believe that public institutions should be protected and invested in, and that those in power could use some further incentive to provide for this.

    Asked by:
    @tashludowyk
    Share
    How can Australian’s allow asylum seekers to be locked up indefinitely, when no one can guarantee their safety?
    12+

    Nauru is in such a parlous state of dysfunction that New Zealand has just announced it is no longer willing to fund its justice system. Staff who report the abuse are sacked and medical staff now confront the threat of a two-year jail sentence for reporting the abuse of women and children. I am worried we have that we have become a country that denies people their basic human rights.

    Asked by:
    Ava
    Share
    Why happiness rather than contentment: are we never satisfied?
    12+

    Because I think that our society promotes the myth of happiness and that more will do it.

    Asked by:
    Winsome Thomas
    Share
    All leaders of the developed world declare that they seek peace, not war. Why then do they continue to manufacture, market, and sell arms on a global scale? Are their brains missing something?
    27+

    The horrors of war are making the planet unliveable. Every decent human being wants it to end.

    Asked by:
    Monica Hingston
    Share
    If vaccination is safe, why has the “Vaccine Court” in USA paid out billions in compensation?ne
    3+

    This is the elephant in the room whenever the question of vaccine safety is discussed on public media.
    I that people who are coerced into vaccination by public campaigns have the right to know accurate information about the safety and effectiveness of vaccination.

    Asked by:
    jon elbourne
    Share
    Who really gets to narrate history?
    4+

    In a university class at the moment I am learning about indigenous land injustice. I came up with this question in a tutorial. History is not objective, and who really shapes it?

    Asked by:
    Bella Barker
    Share
    Can you imagine answering a question that did not involve your conceptual thinking to reply?
    1+

    The is a unspoken assumption that questions require the mind to respond. We live in a world where the conceptual answer is no longer enough, rather the experiential or visceral response offers a different perspective .

    Asked by:
    Alexander Mackenzie
    Share
    Are we currently in World War Three? Is it possible to label it this now. Or will that come later in the history books?
    16+

    We are stuck in the biggest humanitarian crisis since WW2. There are wars all over the place and the world is in ruins. When will we get out of this mess? What realistically needs to be done to create peace in the Middle East and Africa and how much of the unrest is the fault of the rich Western countries?

    Asked by:
    Anna
    Share
    What’s the deal with airline foods?!
    9+

    *slap bass*

    Asked by:
    @seinfeld2000
    Share
    What happens to all the rubber that wears off our tyres as we drive around?
    17+

    The edges of our roads should have piles of worn-off rubber everywhere, but I don’t ever see it.

    Asked by:
    John Knapper
    Share
    Will there always be a European Union and a UN, or have these kind of collective endeavours lost their way under 21st century individualism?
    1+
    Asked by:
    @emsexton
    Share
    Why does the law, endlessly, fail to bring justice?
    15+

    The flaws in our Australian law system, reflect the inequity on a world basis. If Australia, a relatively new country, that has a fresh start, is already in a conundrum with it’s inefficient and biased laws, then what hope is there for transparency and justice on a world level? To illustrate, I lent a friend $45,000 for a mutual project. They refused to pay it back, admitting they just spent it. We made a signed legal contract and I have a bank paper trail. Also, a witness who verified his actions signed an affidavit. Yet, this is not enough for me to retrieve my money or for them to go to jail. This person, continuously cons others with small amounts of money, so that legal fees make it unviable to retrieve the lost money. It is clear that I was conned and that they are thief, yet the justice system has no effective recompense for these serious situations. This person should be in jail and working to pay for my loan. I tried going to the local court and followed the procedure of a small claim. After the sheriff failed to find him, nothing could be done. This is a ludicrous system that fails to protect the vulnerable in our society.
    I believe there is a long overdue overhaul of our justice system, which protects the unjust, provides extreme wealth to the judiciary and fails to facilitate justice.
    I tried Legal Aid, etc and they were unable to assist me.
    What do the great thinkers think?

    Asked by:
    Christina Parris
    Share
    Why do we think working for a living is necessary?
    16+

    Most of us work because it facilitates us being paid, which affords us the ability to live. Some few people manage to pursue passions, vocations and the like. Others make different valuable contributions to society. What is necessary about working – is there a different model of enough where people can live well and contribute to a collective society without it being reduced to the *need* and *imperative* to have a job and be paid. What if there were other ways?

    Asked by:
    @transcendancing
    Share