In the context of homage, sampling and remixing creative works, how do we decide what constitutes originality?
    5+

    New media offers great opportunities for play but creators should continue to be rewarded for their original work, including those creators showing originality in sampled or remixed works. But how do we determine what homages, samples and remixes demonstrate genuine originality and creativity? It matters to me because I work in the arts sector alongside creators and creative works, and others should care about it because the world is going to become a boring place if creators start doing something else because they feel their work just gets ripped off by others without reward or recognition.

    Asked by:
    Sharon Mullins
    Share
    Would you take a drug that induced happiness with one side effect; the following day, you remember being happy but not what had happened?
    3+

    Knowing ourselves seems to be the foundation for everything. It is important to question, and be critical of the thoughts, actions and beliefs that resonate with us. Such contemplation is crucial to continual self-development and sanity. Thus, madness can be partly seen as obliviousness, or in history it was highlighted as forgetting. If we forgot what had made us happy, are we mad?

    Asked by:
    Samantha Tran
    Share
    Why the term ‘climate change’ without a changing climate the world as we know it would not exist, why the misnomer now?
    0

    Because climate change is talked about hundreds of times a day and the meaning of the term and issues tat need to be talked about are at odds. It is simply incorrect use of the english language, in a similar way to the use of ‘cement’ when referring to ‘concrete’!

    Asked by:
    Bridget Nicholson
    Share
    Is the supply of arts greater than the demand for it?
    14+

    Viewed from an economic perspective, does the arts suffer from something similar to the military-industrial complex, minus the extreme violence? It seems like everyone in the arts think that more funding will fix all our problems. I was thinking of this in the light of ever growing artistic output and too much choice that the inner city life has to offer, and the idea that art is like violence in the sense that it will continue to be practiced impulsively by humans regardless of funding. To me, what seems to motivate reasonable decisions and priorities as governments struggle to allocate resources justly is the education and learning environment people have access to rather than the size of our arts or “defence” budget.

    Asked by:
    @Heshekson
    Share
    How can we change the culture of secrecy? Is it all about corporatism or something more?
    4+

    Democracy cannot thrive without transparency. Secrecy undermines grass roots participation in affairs that directly affect them.

    Asked by:
    Evelyn
    Share
    Why do we still think that marriage and children are the path to happiness when so many alternatives exist?!
    43+
    Asked by:
    TC
    Share
    Why do we not value darkness anymore?
    8+

    Light pollution, glare and light trespass are all easy environmental problems to fix. If we can’t (or won’t) fix this, then what chance do we have of reducing or reversing other environmental issues?

    Asked by:
    Sasha Joura
    Share
    If you could choose the legacy you leave behind, what would it be and why?
    19+

    What we should be doing for our future is important.

    Asked by:
    @thatrahrah
    Share
    Are humans the only species known to take their own lives?
    9+

    I thought it was interesting.

    Asked by:
    Sijing Chen
    Share
    Who am I?
    3+

    Because this question haunts me everyday. It matter to me because I’d like to know who I am.
    Because if others know who they are, they might do things differently which benefit them and others.

    Asked by:
    Mark Karki
    Share
    When will the psychiatric regime end?
    5+

    When humanity becomes humane, starts listening to people, rather than propaganda, regimes that torture and control will be exposed and stopped. The psychiatric regime has been going on for over 200 in various countries, enabling genital mutilation on women who opposed their husbands, LSD testing in the 1960s, and various torturous procedures.
    The people forcefully tested with insulin shock and LSD, haven’t received compensation, because our government declares the medical profession were allowed to torture people that way in the 1960s & 70s.
    The people who are being currently subjected to torture by the psychiatric regime, are also unlikely to receive compensation, unless there is wide-spread condemnation for the psychiatric procedures forcefully done in our government’s name on innocent people as young as two and as old as people can be. Electroshock used on 4 year olds, pills fed daily to tranquilise two year olds. Not to mention what they do to people in their prime.
    It is physically obvious what psychiatric torture does to people. It must be stopped.
    How dare anyone think our country is a democracy when this is going on. How dare the organisations of festivals censor psychiatric survivors who speak out because of sponsorship deals. How dare the Australian people be so unaware of what is happening to their citizens.
    The question is when? The answer should be now.

    Asked by:
    @initiallyno
    Share
    For a nation of immigrants why have we become a less welcoming country in the last 10 or so years?
    40+

    I’m annoyed by the illogical and racist emails that I receive from friends whose parents or grandparents came here as so called economic migrants or refugees. Ever since people like Pauline Hanson have come on the scene I’ve seen a change in our culture. I’m sure most Australians don’t want to live in a racist country.

    Asked by:
    Stephen Schmideg
    Share
    What paradigm will replace the current power-centric economic, political system?
    5+

    Most of today’s global problems originate in the competitive foundation of the current economic, political paradigm. We will never realise humanity’s highest goals unless we learn to start from a different place in thinking about the “system” we live within.

    Asked by:
    Jim Brown
    Share